I've got two weeks of work left here, and I can honestly say that I've never been so happy -- no, check that, thrilled -- to be walking away from a job. Now that it's down to a manageable 10 days, I feel like I can breathe a bit.
That isn't to say that this whole prospect of an unsure future isn't a little bit unsettling. Thoughts of the next six months or year keep me up some nights, but not in the same way that this job and this city were keeping me up the last couple months. More excitement than dread this time around.
Last night, I was reading Alexandra Robbins' book The Overachievers, about the pressure to overachieve in high school (and before) to do well in college (and beyond). I ordered it because I so enjoyed her book Conquering Your Quarterlife Crisis, which I read a few years back.
Anyway, it reminded me that I so identified with the latter concept that I e-mailed the author shortly after reading it. So I got up, fired up the computer and, sure enough, there was the e-mail from me to her, and her response, right there in the trusty Gmail archives. I was struck by how I was feeling that I should make this uncertain step a few years ago, and how a lot of the emotions I was feeling then about life and work (and the fact that those two things were synonymous) are the same ones that drove me in the last month or so to make the move out of here.
Selected bits of her note to me, that ring more true now, even, than then:
"If the most important thing in life is to be happy, and you need to make changes in your life to get there, then that's not throwing anything away at all. Forget about the past. That's done - you accomplished what you had hoped to. If you're not satisfied anymore, move on and start over, plugging away in a new direction, even if it means you have to start from scratch, if it's that important to you."
It is. She continues:
"I mean, you're 24. If you were 44 with kids to support and a mortgage to pay, then maybe this would require more analysis regarding your finances. But you don't have those ties. So if you can't take risks now, when are you going to take them? If you were to have everything in your life 'secure' at age 24, then what the heck are you going to do/strive for/learn over the next 50 years?"
And even though I'm, uh, not 24 any more, the point still rings true. If not now, when? Somehow, it's reassuring to me -- almost an endorsement of my plan -- that I've been thinking this same thing for the last three or four years.